Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Predictors of differential response to cognitive, experiential, and self-directed psychotherapeutic procedures.
Abstracts
Group cognitive therapy (CGT), focused expressive psychotherapy (FEP; a form of group experiential psychotherapy), and supportive, self-directed therapy (S/SD) were compared among 63 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Variation among patients' coping styles (externalization) and defensiveness (resistance potential) was used in a prospective test of hypothesized differential treatment–patient interactions. Results suggest that patient characteristics can be used differentially to assign psychotherapy types. Externalizing depressed patients improved more than nonexternalizing depressed patients in CGT, whereas nonexternalizing (internalizing) patients improved most in S/SD. Conversely, high defensive (resistant) patients improved more in S/SD than in either FEP or CGT, whereas low defensive patients improved more in CGT than in S/SD.
Keywords | |
Journal |
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
|
Author | |
Publisher |
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
|
Year of Publication |
1991
|
Volume |
59
|
Issue |
2
|
Number of Pages |
333-340,
|
ISSN Number |
1939-2117(Electronic),0022-006X(Print)
|
DOI |
10.1037/0022-006X.59.2.333
|